McDonald, Neiman Laquinta v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 2013·No. 05-12-00521-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00521-CR

NEIMAN LAQUINTA MCDONALD, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-54350-Y

ORDER

In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The

record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald, Neiman Laquinta v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

McDonald, Neiman Laquinta v. State (McDonald, Neiman Laquinta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.