Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedSeptember 24, 2020

Docket81728

StatusPublished

This text of Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State) (Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL LEE MCDONALD, No. 81728 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FL IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB SEP 2i 2020 BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELIZABEM A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents, By 5.Y DEPUTY CLERr'../1 ( and THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandarnus or prohibition appears to seek an order vacating petitioner's conviction for battery constituting domestic violence on the grounds that he was erroneously deprived of a jury trial. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

((>) 1947A ofzigy. 020 - 35172 We reiterate that Ipletitioned carilies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Aelem. , C.J. Pickering

•-P.Pf4 11.11e-N , J. Hardesty

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Michael Lee McDonald Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

tOi 1947A .60e2) 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL LEE MCDONALD, No. 81728 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FL IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB SEP 2i 2020 BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELIZABEM A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents, By 5.Y DEPUTY CLERr'../1 ( and THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandarnus or prohibition appears to seek an order vacating petitioner's conviction for battery constituting domestic violence on the grounds that he was erroneously deprived of a jury trial. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

((>) 1947A ofzigy. 020 - 35172 We reiterate that Ipletitioned carilies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Aelem. , C.J. Pickering

•-P.Pf4 11.11e-N , J. Hardesty

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Michael Lee McDonald Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

tOi 1947A .60e2) 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-michael-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack