McDonagh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDonagh v. State

839 So. 2d 831, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2571, 2003 WL 728961

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 2003

DocketNo. 4D01-4571

StatusPublished

This text of 839 So. 2d 831 (McDonagh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonagh v. State, 839 So. 2d 831, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2571, 2003 WL 728961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled no contest to charges that she had written several checks to herself from her employer’s account without permission. We agree with her argument that restitution should not have included $800 in secretarial wages because those wages would have been incurred in any event. We affirm the other amounts [832]*832included in restitution but remand for deduction of the $800 item.

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled no contest to charges that she had written several checks to herself from her employer’s account without permission. We agree with her argument that restitution should not have included $800 in secretarial wages because those wages would have been incurred in any event. We affirm the other amounts [832]*832included in restitution but remand for deduction of the $800 item.

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

839 So. 2d 831, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2571, 2003 WL 728961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonagh-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.