McDole v. State

268 So. 2d 557
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1972·No. No. Q-259·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See Brown v. State, 181 So.2d 578 (Fla.App.1965) and Rhoden v. State, 227 So.2d 349 (Fla.App.1969).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDole v. State, 268 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

268 So. 2d 557 (McDole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
181 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Rhoden v. State
227 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)