McDermott v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McDermott v. City of New York

250 A.D.2d 538, 673 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5949

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 26, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction, dated August 19, 1996, finding petitioner guilty of various charges and specifications, and dismissing him from his employment with the Department, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered March 5, 1997) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of respondent that petitioner was absent without leave during several days in March 1994 and again from January 1995 until the date of the administrative hearing in 1996 (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230). The record further supports the Hearing Officer’s finding, after assessing testimony from various witnesses, including petitioner and his family members, that petitioner was guilty of multiple instances of failure to obey lawful orders of his superiors, and of a pattern of harassment of a superior officer and that officer’s family. We find no basis to disturb the determinations of credibility made by the trier of fact (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443).

Under the circumstances, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to the proven offenses as to shock our sense of fairness (see, Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827, 828; Matter of Alfieri v Murphy, 38 NY2d 976, 977). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction, dated August 19, 1996, finding petitioner guilty of various charges and specifications, and dismissing him from his employment with the Department, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered March 5, 1997) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of respondent that petitioner was absent without leave during several days in March 1994 and again from January 1995 until the date of the administrative hearing in 1996 (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230). The record further supports the Hearing Officer’s finding, after assessing testimony from various witnesses, including petitioner and his family members, that petitioner was guilty of multiple instances of failure to obey lawful orders of his superiors, and of a pattern of harassment of a superior officer and that officer’s family. We find no basis to disturb the determinations of credibility made by the trier of fact (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443).

Under the circumstances, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to the proven offenses as to shock our sense of fairness (see, Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827, 828; Matter of Alfieri v Murphy, 38 NY2d 976, 977). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

McDermott v. City of New York, 250 A.D.2d 538, 673 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

250 A.D.2d 538 (McDermott v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related