McDermott v. City of Buffalo

153 A.D. 935, 138 N.Y.S. 1127

This text of 153 A.D. 935 (McDermott v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDermott v. City of Buffalo, 153 A.D. 935, 138 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Foote, J. (dissenting):

There was not sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligence to" entitle plaintiff to have that question left to the jury. The weather conditions prior to the day of the accident were not shown. The uneven condition of the icy surface of the walk was not shown to have been due to neglect. It may have been common to all or many of the walks in the city at that time because of weather conditions, and in spite of due diligence to keep them clean. (Rogers v. City of Rome, 96 App. Div. 427; Hatch v. City of Emira, 142 id. 174; Harrington v. City of Buffalo, 121 N. Y.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. City of Rome
96 A.D. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 A.D. 935, 138 N.Y.S. 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdermott-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1912.