McDermott v. Bennett

62 A. 637, 213 Pa. 129, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 390
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 4, 1905
DocketAppeals, Nos. 32 and 33
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 A. 637 (McDermott v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDermott v. Bennett, 62 A. 637, 213 Pa. 129, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 390 (Pa. 1905).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

These two cases are substantially alike and were argued together.

The appellant in her affidavit for a rule to open the judgments sets out that the. notes were given to counsel by a client who was in serious difficulties under circumstances which, even if they should not be shown to amount to fraud and coercion as charged, are certainly such as to justify full investigation.

Order reversed and rule, directed to be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Lenchner
205 A.2d 626 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A. 637, 213 Pa. 129, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdermott-v-bennett-pa-1905.