McDaughtery v. Arce

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 LESESTER D. MCDAUGHTERY, Case No. 25-cv-02474-JSC g Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 V. 11 Defendant. 12 On April 23, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to E 13 || present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was granted 28 days to file an 14 amended complaint, and warned that if he did not do so the case would be dismissed. He has not 3 15 || filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or shown cause why not. This case is 16 accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 i 17 || (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does not Z 18 || amend, further district court determination is necessary). 19 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 21 Dated: July 24, 2025 22 23 Degli stot D □ JAQQUELINE SCOTT CORL 24 United States District Judge 25 26 27 28