McDaniels v. United States

329 F. App'x 443
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2009·No. No. 09-6265·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Wayne McDaniels appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny McDaniels’s motions for appointment of counsel, injunc-tive relief, default judgment, and production of documents, and affirm the judgment of the district court. McDaniels v. United States, No. 4:07-cv-03386-TLW (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniels v. United States, 329 F. App'x 443 (4th Cir. 2009).

329 F. App'x 443 (McDaniels v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related