McDaniels v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McDaniels v. State

176 S.W.2d 948, 146 Tex. Crim. 541, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 795

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 12, 1944

DocketNo. 22707.

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.W.2d 948 (McDaniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniels v. State, 176 S.W.2d 948, 146 Tex. Crim. 541, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 795 (Tex. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for a violation of the liquor laws of McCulloch County, and fined the sum of $250.00, hence this appeal.

There‘are no bills of exceptions in the record, and the undisputed facts evidence a sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area.

As provided by law, the county attorney read the information before the jury in the opening of the trial. See Art. 612 (1), C. C . P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for a violation of the liquor laws of McCulloch County, and fined the sum of $250.00, hence this appeal.

There‘are no bills of exceptions in the record, and the undisputed facts evidence a sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area.

As provided by law, the county attorney read the information before the jury in the opening of the trial. See Art. 612 (1), C. C . P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.W.2d 948, 146 Tex. Crim. 541, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniels-v-state-texcrimapp-1944.