McDaniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDaniels v. State

707 So. 2d 971, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3745, 1998 WL 167242

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 1998

DocketNo. 96-2124

StatusPublished

This text of 707 So. 2d 971 (McDaniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniels v. State, 707 So. 2d 971, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3745, 1998 WL 167242 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DEFINE AND/OR CLARIFY SENTENCE

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks clarification of our March 21, 1997 opinion because the classification office of the Department of Corrections and he are confused, he says. We have no jurisdiction. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Judges of District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, 405 So.2d 980 (Fla.1981). Because the motion is unauthorized and untimely it is stricken.

Petitioner should seek whatever relief he needs by filing in the trial court.

MOTION STRICKEN.

DAUKSCH, COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI