McDaniels v. McDaniels

180 So. 2d 467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1965
DocketNo. G-539
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 180 So. 2d 467 (McDaniels v. McDaniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDaniels v. McDaniels, 180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 3.16, 31 F.S.A., the petition for rehearing was not timely served in the lower court and said court was therefore precluded from legally entertaining the same1 and the amended final decree must be reversed. Although the point was not raised by appellant, nevertheless, the record is before this court and the date of the final decree and date of filing petition for rehearing shown therein reveals the failure to. comply with the above stated Rule. There is no showing that said cause falls within, any of the provisions of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.38, 30 F.S.A.

Therefore, the order appealed is reversed and the Chancellor is directed to reinstate-the original final decree.

W1GGINTON, Acting C. J., and STUR-GIS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirby v. Speight
217 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Ritchie
181 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 So. 2d 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniels-v-mcdaniels-fladistctapp-1965.