McDaniel v. Whitfield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDaniel v. Whitfield

214 So. 3d 794, 2017 WL 1327923, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4994

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 2017

DocketCASE NO. 1D16-4572

StatusPublished

This text of 214 So. 3d 794 (McDaniel v. Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. Whitfield, 214 So. 3d 794, 2017 WL 1327923, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4994 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. Within the appeal, appellant filed a petition for writ of certiorari. The order is not appealable and we decline to treat the notice of appeal as invoking the Court’s certiorari jurisdiction because appellant has failed to show any harm that is incurable by a final appeal. See Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“If petitioner has failed to [795]*795make a prima facie showing of irreparable harm, we lack jurisdiction and will enter an order dismissing the petition.”) The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. Within the appeal, appellant filed a petition for writ of certiorari. The order is not appealable and we decline to treat the notice of appeal as invoking the Court’s certiorari jurisdiction because appellant has failed to show any harm that is incurable by a final appeal. See Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“If petitioner has failed to [795]*795make a prima facie showing of irreparable harm, we lack jurisdiction and will enter an order dismissing the petition.”) The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 So. 3d 794, 2017 WL 1327923, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-whitfield-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack