McDaniel v. Walden
This text of 146 S.E. 767 (McDaniel v. Walden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill of exceptions recites that the brief of evidence introduced on the trial, approved by the judge, is material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of. It appears from a statement of the clerk in the record, preceding his certificate, that certain pages of the paper purporting to be the brief of the evidence when filed with him were missing, and it likewise appears from an inspection of this paper that these papers are missing. A proper decision of all the assignments of error depends upon a complete brief of the evidence. In these circumstances this court can not intelligently pass upon these assignments of error, and the judgment of the court below most be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 S.E. 767, 168 Ga. 40, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-walden-ga-1929.