McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 9, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-03526·Unknown

Opinion

—<_ i □□□□ | DATE FILED: 10/9/202¢ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CURTIS McDANIEL, : : ORDER Plaintiff, : : 19-CV-3526 (JPO) (JLC) - against - : CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., : Defendants. : we ee eK JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. On September 21, 2020, pro se plaintiff filed his second amended complaint. By order dated October 7, 2020, Judge Oetken dismissed certain defendants named in the complaint who were immune from this lawsuit and directed the Clerk of Court to amend the complaint to properly name the defendant City of New York. Dkt. No. 50. Accordingly, the second amended complaint is now ready to be served on the newly added defendants. Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process. . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(8) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Officers Gregory Welch, Daniel Howell, Patrick Fanning, Kenneth Faulkner, Bobby Wilkins, Thomas Williams (the “Defendant Officers”) and Howard Leader through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process

Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each of these defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon

these defendants. The addresses for each of these defendants (except for Officer Thomas William) are attached to the end of this Order. With respect to defendant Officer William, the pro se plaintiff does not provide an address at which to serve him. Accordingly, the New York City Law Department, which is the attorney for and agent of the NYPD and DOC, is directed to ascertain the badge number of Officer

William and the address where that defendant may be served.1 The Law Department should provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court by November 9, 2020, at which time the Court will direct service of the second amended complaint on Officer William through the U.S Marshals. Finally, in light of the City’s August 14, 2020 letter informing the Court that they will not make any decisions as to their representation of the Defendant Officers until after each has been served, the Court hereby extends the deadline by

which the City and Quilty must respond to the second amended complaint to no later than 60 days after the service of the second amended complaint on the

1 If Officer William is a current or former DOC employee or official, the Law Department should note in the response to this order that an electronic request for a waiver of service can be made under the e-service agreement for cases involving DOC defendants, rather than by personal service at a DOC facility. If Officer William is not a current or former DOC employee or official, but otherwise works or worked at a DOC facility, the Law Department must provide an address where the individual may be served. Defendant Officers. This approach will provide the City with the time needed to make representation decisions as to the Defendant Officers and to file one consolidated response on behalf of all parties it chooses to represent (rather than potentially submitting several pleadings piecemeal). After the parties respond to the second amended complaint, the Court will issue an order scheduling an initial conference by telephone to discuss both the timing and scope of discovery and the possibility of settlement. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2020 New York, New York

AMES L. COTT | States Magistrate Judge

A copy of this Order has been mailed to: Curtis McDaniel NYSID: 00474252R B&C No. 3491901551 Bare Hill C.F. Caller Box 20 181 Brand Rd. Malone, NY 12953

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES 1. Officer Gregory Welch, Shield No. 7382 New York City Police Department Emergency Service Unit Floyd Bennett Field Brooklyn, NY 11234 2. Police Officer Daniel Howell, Shield No. 7279 New York City Police Department 32nd Detective Squad 250 West 135th Street New York, NY 10030 3. Police Officer Kenneth Faulkner, Shield No. 4612 New York City Police Department Bronx Robbery Squad 1086 Simpson Street Bronx, NY 10459 4. Officer Patrick Fanning, Shield No. 8581 New York City Police Department Emergency Service Unit Floyd Bennett Field Brooklyn, NY 11234 5. Officer Bobby Wilkins, Shield No. 19409 New York City Police Department Emergency Service Unit Floyd Bennett Field Brooklyn, NY 11234 6. Howard Leader 11-11 Park Place New York, NY 10007

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York (McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)