McDaniel v. Tebbetts

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

McDaniel v. Tebbetts

60 N.H. 497

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 N.H. 497 (McDaniel v. Tebbetts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. Tebbetts, 60 N.H. 497 (N.H. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

Assessors of taxes are not liable for errors of judgment, unintentional mistakes, irregularities, or illegalities in the assessment. In cases of erroneous assessment and overvaluation, the tax-payer has an adequate remedy by appeal, in the form of a petition for abatement. Edes v. Boardman, 58 N. H. 580, 596; Odiorne v. Rand, 59 N. H. 504.

Exceptions overruled.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

Assessors of taxes are not liable for errors of judgment, unintentional mistakes, irregularities, or illegalities in the assessment. In cases of erroneous assessment and overvaluation, the tax-payer has an adequate remedy by appeal, in the form of a petition for abatement. Edes v. Boardman, 58 N. H. 580, 596; Odiorne v. Rand, 59 N. H. 504.

Exceptions overruled.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.H. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-tebbetts-nh-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack