McDaniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McDaniel v. State

176 S.W.2d 172

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 8, 1943

DocketNo. 22646

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.W.2d 172 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 176 S.W.2d 172 (Tex. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale [173]*173in a dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $150.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review. The information and all matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale [173]*173in a dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $150.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review. The information and all matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.W.2d 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-texcrimapp-1943.