McDaniel v. State

277 S.W. 130, 102 Tex. Crim. 269, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDaniel v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Tex. Crim. 354
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 1925·No. No. 9204.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Throckmorton County of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts. There are many exceptions to the charge of the court, and many special charges requested, but it is impossible for us to appraise the effect of any of them in the absence of a statement of facts. We find nothing in the bills of exception raising or presenting any error which can be held by us hurtful *270 or injurious to the rights of appellant in the absence of a statement of facts.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniel v. State, 277 S.W. 130, 102 Tex. Crim. 269, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1089 (Tex. 1925).

277 S.W. 130 (McDaniel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.