McDaniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McDaniel v. State

277 S.W. 130, 102 Tex. Crim. 269, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1089

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 17, 1925

DocketNo. 9204.

StatusPublished

This text of 277 S.W. 130 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 277 S.W. 130, 102 Tex. Crim. 269, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1089 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Throckmorton County of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts. There are many exceptions to the charge of the court, and many special charges requested, but it is impossible for us to appraise the effect of any of them in the absence of a statement of facts. We find nothing in the bills of exception raising or presenting any error which can be held by us hurtful *270 or injurious to the rights of appellant in the absence of a statement of facts.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Throckmorton County of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts. There are many exceptions to the charge of the court, and many special charges requested, but it is impossible for us to appraise the effect of any of them in the absence of a statement of facts. We find nothing in the bills of exception raising or presenting any error which can be held by us hurtful *270 or injurious to the rights of appellant in the absence of a statement of facts.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 S.W. 130, 102 Tex. Crim. 269, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.