McDaniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McDaniel v. State

120 P. 299, 6 Okla. Crim. 710

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 11, 1912

DocketNo. A-781.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 P. 299 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 120 P. 299, 6 Okla. Crim. 710 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

M. V. McDaniel, plaintiff in error, was convicted, on an indictment the county court of Craig county, which charged the unlawful sale of one pint of whisky. May 10, 1909, upon arraignment he entered a plea of guilty as charged, and the court appointed May 26th as the time for pronouncing judgment and sentence. At which time the case was continued for sentence and was so continued from term to term until' March 31, 1910, at which time the defendant appeared and filed a. motion to withdraw his plea of guilty heretofore entered and to substitute therefor a plea of not guilty, which motion was by the court overruled, and thereupon the court sentenced the defendant to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred' and fifty dollars and costs. From which judgment the defendant appealed by petition in error with transcript attached. The identical and the only question presented' on this appeal is the same as that in the-case of Jenkins v. State, infra. For the reasons given in the opinion in-that ease the judgment of the county court of Craig county is affirmed-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

M. V. McDaniel, plaintiff in error, was convicted, on an indictment the county court of Craig county, which charged the unlawful sale of one pint of whisky. May 10, 1909, upon arraignment he entered a plea of guilty as charged, and the court appointed May 26th as the time for pronouncing judgment and sentence. At which time the case was continued for sentence and was so continued from term to term until' March 31, 1910, at which time the defendant appeared and filed a. motion to withdraw his plea of guilty heretofore entered and to substitute therefor a plea of not guilty, which motion was by the court overruled, and thereupon the court sentenced the defendant to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred' and fifty dollars and costs. From which judgment the defendant appealed by petition in error with transcript attached. The identical and the only question presented' on this appeal is the same as that in the-case of Jenkins v. State, infra. For the reasons given in the opinion in-that ease the judgment of the county court of Craig county is affirmed-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 P. 299, 6 Okla. Crim. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack