McDaniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McDaniel v. State

1911 OK CR 530, 119 P. 270, 6 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 524

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 11, 1911

DocketNo. A-1147.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 530 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 1911 OK CR 530, 119 P. 270, 6 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 524 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was, by information filed in the district court of Pushmataha county on the 13th day of July, 1909, charged with grand larceny. A change óf venue was granted to the district court of LeFlore county. Upon his trial there had, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of one year. In accordance with the verdict, on November 12, 1910, judgment and sentence was pronounced and entered. The record shows that notices of appeal were not served on the county attorney and cleric of the district court within the time required by law. Por this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was, by information filed in the district court of Pushmataha county on the 13th day of July, 1909, charged with grand larceny. A change óf venue was granted to the district court of LeFlore county. Upon his trial there had, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of one year. In accordance with the verdict, on November 12, 1910, judgment and sentence was pronounced and entered. The record shows that notices of appeal were not served on the county attorney and cleric of the district court within the time required by law. Por this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 530, 119 P. 270, 6 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.