McDaniel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McDaniel v. State

472 S.W.3d 615, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 923, 2015 WL 5435035

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2015·No. No. ED 102101·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jasmine McDaniel (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jasmine McDaniel (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

McDaniel v. State, 472 S.W.3d 615, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 923, 2015 WL 5435035 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

472 S.W.3d 615 (McDaniel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.