McDaniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McDaniel v. State

67 Ga. App. 274

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1942

Docket29502

StatusPublished

This text of 67 Ga. App. 274 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 67 Ga. App. 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder, and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the verdict; and the overruling of the motion for new trial, containing the general grounds only, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur. A. T. Walden, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin,'solicitor-general, Durwood T. Bye, Quincy 0. Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder, and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the verdict; and the overruling of the motion for new trial, containing the general grounds only, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur. A. T. Walden, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin,'solicitor-general, Durwood T. Bye, Quincy 0. Arnold, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 Ga. App. 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-gactapp-1942.