McDaniel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDaniel v. State

789 So. 2d 1223, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10263, 2001 WL 826728

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 2001

DocketNo. 1D00-3720

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 789 So. 2d 1223 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 789 So. 2d 1223, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10263, 2001 WL 826728 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. When the trial court denied the motion, appellant’s direct appeal from his convictions and sentences was pending review in the supreme court. McDaniel v. State, 790 So.2d 441 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), review denied, No. SC00-895, 791 So.2d 1099 (Fla. June 20, 2001). Therefore, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion. Burch v. State, 721 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider post-conviction motion while a direct appeal is still pending). Accordingly, we reverse the order, and remand with directions that the trial court again consider and rule upon the motion now that appellant’s direct appeals have been exhausted.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. When the trial court denied the motion, appellant’s direct appeal from his convictions and sentences was pending review in the supreme court. McDaniel v. State, 790 So.2d 441 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), review denied, No. SC00-895, 791 So.2d 1099 (Fla. June 20, 2001). Therefore, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion. Burch v. State, 721 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider post-conviction motion while a direct appeal is still pending). Accordingly, we reverse the order, and remand with directions that the trial court again consider and rule upon the motion now that appellant’s direct appeals have been exhausted.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 So. 2d 1223, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10263, 2001 WL 826728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack