McDaniel v. State

620 So. 2d 1308, 1993 WL 267462
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 21, 1993
Docket92-1553
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 1308 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDaniel v. State, 620 So. 2d 1308, 1993 WL 267462 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

620 So.2d 1308 (1993)

Virgil Ray McDANIEL, Sr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-1553.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 21, 1993.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of second degree murder of his son. He argues that the trial court erred in submitting the second degree murder charge since at most the evidence proved only the crime of manslaughter. We agree and reverse based on Borders v. State, 433 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Pierce v. State, 376 So.2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1980); and Martinez v. State, 360 So.2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 367 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 1979).

In the instant case, the record reveals that Ray, the son and victim, initiated the altercation by hitting his father in the mouth and knocking him to the ground. Although the father's use of a knife to ward off further attack by his son may have been excessive, thereby negating a finding of self-defense, his acts did not evince a depraved mind. No evidence was presented that McDaniel acted out of ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent. The state failed to prove a prima facie case of second degree murder. Therefore, we reduce his conviction to manslaughter and remand to the trial court for resentencing.

We find no error in the remaining points raised. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

WARNER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Antonio Devon Williams v. State of Florida
244 So. 3d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Kyree Luis Perez v. State of Florida
187 So. 3d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
John Henry v. State
145 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Antoine v. State
138 So. 3d 1064 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Morgan v. State
127 So. 3d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Dorsey v. State
74 So. 3d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Wiley v. State
60 So. 3d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Poole v. State
30 So. 3d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Bellamy v. State
977 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Light v. State
841 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Christian v. State
693 So. 2d 990 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Williams v. State
674 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 So. 2d 1308, 1993 WL 267462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.