McDaniel v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McDaniel v. State

94 So. 2d 648, 39 Ala. App. 85, 1957 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 32

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 1957

Docket7 Div. 479

StatusPublished

This text of 94 So. 2d 648 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 94 So. 2d 648, 39 Ala. App. 85, 1957 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 32 (Ala. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

This appellant stands convicted of illegally possessing prohibited liquors or beverages.

The evidence presented by the State is overwhelming in its tendencies to establish his guilt. The defense presented no evidence.

No brief was filed in the appellant’s behalf. We have however, consonant with the duty imposed upon us, examined the record for error.

The court’s ruling was invoked several times. In each instance the court either ruled with the appellant, or if adverse to the appellant, its ruling was patently correct, and involved principles well settled in previous decisions of this court, or of our Supreme Court. To write t,o these points would be mere reiteration of these principles. We therefore refrain from a discussion of them.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI