McDaniel v. Pattison

32 P. 805, 98 Cal. 86, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 865
California Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 1893·No. 14280·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinions

The Court. —

We are satisfied, with opinions filed and the conclusion reached by Department One when this case was before it for decision, and the judgment is therefore reversed.

In their petition for a rehearing respondents, claim that they are entitled to assert their rights as heirs, but it is evident from the pleadings, findings, and decree that the parties and the court below ¡proceeded upon the theory that plaintiffs were claiming as devisees and not as heirs. The decree therefore cannot be modified, but we think there is enough in the complaint to justify an order allowing the plaintiffs to amend their complaint? if they desire so to do, so as to assert any claim they may have by reason of their heirship.

The judgment and order are reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to allow the parties to amend their pleadings, if they be so advised.

Garoutte, J., McFarland, J., Paterson, J., Harrison, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniel v. Pattison, 32 P. 805, 98 Cal. 86, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 865 (Cal. 1893).

32 P. 805 (McDaniel v. Pattison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Techu-El v. Conetta
S.D. New York, 2022
Stevens v. Torregano
192 Cal. App. 2d 105 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
McGregor v. McGregor
101 F. Supp. 848 (D. Colorado, 1951)
Brissie v. Craig
62 S.E.2d 330 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Reed v. Hayward
144 P.2d 561 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Ahlborn v. Peters
100 P.2d 542 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Security-First National Bank v. Green
46 P.2d 1007 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank
221 P. 368 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
In Re Estate of Thompson
198 P. 795 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
In Re the Estate of Walker
117 P. 510 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Cooney v. Glynn
108 P. 506 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Estate of Patterson
102 P. 941 (California Supreme Court, 1909)
Estate of Christensen
68 P. 112 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Simons v. Bedell
55 P. 3 (California Supreme Court, 1898)