McDaniel v. NYC Fire Department

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 21, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00995·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CURTIS McDANIEL, Plaintiff, -against- 20-CV-0995 (PGG) NYC FIRE DEPARTMENT, NYC POLICE ORDER OF SERVICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN and JANE DOES 1-7, CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at Bare Hill Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that unidentified “John and Jane Doe” officers of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) and the New York City Fire Department (“FDNY”) illegally searched his apartment on three separate occasions. He also alleges that during one of those occasions, officers falsely arrested him. He names as defendants the City of New York and six John and Jane Doe defendants. By order dated May 14, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 DISCUSSION A. Service on the City of New York Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee, even when they have been granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that the summons and complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served a summons and the amended complaint until the Court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered that

summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date the summons is issued. If the amended complaint is not served within that time, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki, 378 F. App’x 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals’ failure to effect service automatically constitutes ‘good cause’ for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”). To allow Plaintiff to effect service of the amended complaint on Defendant City of New York through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S.

Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for this defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for the City of New York and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon this defendant. Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. Valentin order Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying an unidentified defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the amended 2 complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the NYPD and the FDNY to identify the six John and Jane Doe defendants whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here; specifically, the officers who (1) searched his apartment on July 11, 2018, February 25, 2019, and in March 2019, and the officers who (2) arrested him on July 11, 2018. It is therefore ordered that the New York

City Law Department, which is the attorney for and agent of the NYPD and the FDNY, must ascertain the identity and badge number of each John and Jane Doe defendant whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the defendant may be served. The Law Department must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file a second amended complaint naming the newly identified defendants. The second amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original and amended complaint. A second amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint, the Court will screen it and, if necessary, issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the named John and Jane Doe Defendants

and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for the City of New York, complete the USM-285 form with the address for the City of New York, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service on the City of New York to the U.S. Marshals Service.

3 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and the amended complaint to the New York City Law Department at: 100 Church Street, New York, NY 10007. An amended civil rights complaint form is attached to this order. SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 21, 2020 New York, New York

PAUL G. GARDEPHE United States District Judge

4 DEFENDANT AND SERVICE ADDRESS

New York City Law Department 100 Church Street New York, NY 10007

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CVE Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

“against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ssssssss...0.0.0. L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 5/20/16

I. LEGAL BASIS FOR CLAIM State below the federal legal basis for your claim, if known. This form is designed primarily for prisoners challenging the constitutionality of their conditions of confinement; those claims are often brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniel v. NYC Fire Department, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

McDaniel v. NYC Fire Department (McDaniel v. NYC Fire Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Pataki
378 F. App'x 50 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)