McDaniel v. North Carolina

392 U.S. 665, 88 S. Ct. 2310, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1359, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1174
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1968·No. 1599 M·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 219.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 228.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniel v. North Carolina, 392 U.S. 665, 88 S. Ct. 2310, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1359, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1174 (1968).

392 U.S. 665 (McDaniel v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LaRue v. State
224 S.E.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
State v. Crump
178 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Bryson
259 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)