Home/Supreme Court/McDaniel v. North Carolina

McDaniel v. North Carolina

392 U.S. 665, 88 S. Ct. 2310, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1359, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1174
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1968
Docket1599 M
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 665 (McDaniel v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDaniel v. North Carolina, 392 U.S. 665, 88 S. Ct. 2310, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1359, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1174 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 219.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 228.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LaRue v. State
224 S.E.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
State v. Crump
178 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Bryson
259 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 U.S. 665, 88 S. Ct. 2310, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1359, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-north-carolina-scotus-1968.