McDaniel v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Alabama

McDaniel v. McDaniel

74 So. 947, 199 Ala. 467, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 207

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 12, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 So. 947 (McDaniel v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. McDaniel, 74 So. 947, 199 Ala. 467, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 207 (Ala. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

MAYFIELD, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the probate court of Lauderdale county, confirming the report of the commissioners who set aside and allotted a homestead to the widow, out of the estate of her deceased husband, as is authorized by statute. — Code, §§ 4205-4230. The statute authorizing appeals from such decree (section 4216 of the Code) requires the appeal to be taken within 20 days. The appeal in this case was not taken within the prescribed time. The decree appealed from was of date April 25, 1916, and the appeal 'was not taken until May 22, 1916.

It may not be out of place to say that the record and the briefs were examined before we noticed that the appeal was not taken [468]*468within time, and that nothing was therein found which would justify or authorize a reversal of the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

Anderson, C. J., and Somerville and Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAYFIELD, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the probate court of Lauderdale county, confirming the report of the commissioners who set aside and allotted a homestead to the widow, out of the estate of her deceased husband, as is authorized by statute. — Code, §§ 4205-4230. The statute authorizing appeals from such decree (section 4216 of the Code) requires the appeal to be taken within 20 days. The appeal in this case was not taken within the prescribed time. The decree appealed from was of date April 25, 1916, and the appeal 'was not taken until May 22, 1916.

It may not be out of place to say that the record and the briefs were examined before we noticed that the appeal was not taken [468]*468within time, and that nothing was therein found which would justify or authorize a reversal of the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

Anderson, C. J., and Somerville and Thomas, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 So. 947, 199 Ala. 467, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-mcdaniel-ala-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack