McDaniel v. Ludeau

186 So. 26, 191 La. 556, 1938 La. LEXIS 1392
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 28, 1938
DocketNo. 34875.
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 26 (McDaniel v. Ludeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDaniel v. Ludeau, 186 So. 26, 191 La. 556, 1938 La. LEXIS 1392 (La. 1938).

Opinion

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is the same as in the case of Mrs. Emma Rosa Tate Fontenot v. Emile Ludeau et al., La.Sup., 186 So. 21.1 For the reasons given in the opinion ren *557 dered in that case, the judgment appealed from in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion referred to. The defendants are to pay the costs of this appeal. The liability for all other court costs is to abide the final disposition of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fontenot v. Ludeau
186 So. 21 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 26, 191 La. 556, 1938 La. LEXIS 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-ludeau-la-1938.