McDaniel v. Herbert

252 A.D.2d 985, 676 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8521

This text of 252 A.D.2d 985 (McDaniel v. Herbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDaniel v. Herbert, 252 A.D.2d 985, 676 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly [986]*986dismissed the petition seeking recalculation of petitioner’s legal confinement dates. This proceeding is barred by res judicata (see, Davie v Dwyer, 155 AD2d 921). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davie v. Dwyer
155 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 985, 676 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-herbert-nyappdiv-1998.