McDaniel v. General Motors Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals

McDaniel v. General Motors Corporation

238 S.W.3d 742, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559, 2007 WL 3342486

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 13, 2007

DocketED 89782

StatusPublished

This text of 238 S.W.3d 742 (McDaniel v. General Motors Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. General Motors Corporation, 238 S.W.3d 742, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559, 2007 WL 3342486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elbert McDaniel appeals two awards by the Labor and Industrial Relations Com *743 mission (“Commission”), one relating to a lower back injury and one relating to a condition in McDaniel’s knees. McDaniel appeals the award relating to his lower back injury finding that he did not suffer an injury by occupational disease, finding that the injury caused him 10 percent permanent partial disability, denying future medical expenses, and assessing no liability to the Second Injury Fund. McDaniel also appeals the award denying him worker’s compensation benefits for the condition in his knees. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s awards.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The awards are affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elbert McDaniel appeals two awards by the Labor and Industrial Relations Com *743 mission (“Commission”), one relating to a lower back injury and one relating to a condition in McDaniel’s knees. McDaniel appeals the award relating to his lower back injury finding that he did not suffer an injury by occupational disease, finding that the injury caused him 10 percent permanent partial disability, denying future medical expenses, and assessing no liability to the Second Injury Fund. McDaniel also appeals the award denying him worker’s compensation benefits for the condition in his knees. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s awards.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The awards are affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 S.W.3d 742, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559, 2007 WL 3342486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-general-motors-corporation-moctapp-2007.