McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank

Fifth Circuit

McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank

554 F.2d 1391

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 8, 1977

DocketNos. 75-2410, 75-2514 and 75-2515

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 554 F.2d 1391 (McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank, 554 F.2d 1391 (5th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 6, 1976, 5 Cir., 1976, 543 F.2d 568).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORN-BERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

The parties in No. 75-4397, Kennedy v. Plaza Pontiac, No. 75-4408, Reed v. Welch Oldsmobile and No. 76-1158, Hicks v. General Motors, 5 Cir., 544 F.2d 516 are entitled without further leave to timely file amicus briefs if they so desire.

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge, is recused and did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI