McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank

554 F.2d 1391
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 8, 1977·No. Nos. 75-2410, 75-2514 and 75-2515·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 6, 1976, 5 Cir., 1976, 543 F.2d 568).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORN-BERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

The parties in No. 75-4397, Kennedy v. Plaza Pontiac, No. 75-4408, Reed v. Welch Oldsmobile and No. 76-1158, Hicks v. General Motors, 5 Cir., 544 F.2d 516 are entitled without further leave to timely file amicus briefs if they so desire.

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge, is recused and did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank, 554 F.2d 1391 (5th Cir. 1977).

554 F.2d 1391 (McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related