McDaniel v. Dougherty
This text of 42 Ala. 506 (McDaniel v. Dougherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
The second section of the ordinance of the convention adopted 21st September, 1865, (Revised Code, p. 58,) excludes from the computation of time requisite to complete the bar of the statute of limitations and non-claim, a specified period. This has no application to the law prescribing the term of the court to which an endorsee is required to sue the maker in order to hold the endorser liable. This latter law is neither a statute of limitation or non-claim. The court erred in the charge given.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Ala. 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-dougherty-ala-1868.