McDaniel v. City of Lakeland
This text of 304 So. 2d 515 (McDaniel v. City of Lakeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John K. McDANIEL, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LAKELAND, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Frank E. Hamilton, III, of Hamilton, Douglas & Bennett, Orlando, for appellant.
Stephen C. Watson, Asst. City Atty., Lakeland, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the petition for writ of mandamus did not demonstrate that the petitioner had a clear and already established legal right to the performance of a duty by any of the respondents. Therefore, the final order dismissing the petition is affirmed, without prejudice to the petitioner's institution of a separate action for declaratory *516 judgment or for damages to secure the relief he has sought in this one.
Affirmed.
McNULTY, C.J., GRIMES, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 So. 2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-city-of-lakeland-fladistctapp-1974.