McDaniel ex rel. Semmes v. Fish
16 F. Cas. 13, 2 D.C. 160, 2 Cranch 160
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1818
StatusPublished
This text of 16 F. Cas. 13 (McDaniel ex rel. Semmes v. Fish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McDaniel ex rel. Semmes v. Fish, 16 F. Cas. 13, 2 D.C. 160, 2 Cranch 160 (circtddc 1818).
Opinion
(nem. con.) refused to reinstate the cause, on account of the wide door it would open to motions of this kind; and because the merits of the case might be given in evidence in mitigation of the damages, in the present action upon the replevin-bond.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 13, 2 D.C. 160, 2 Cranch 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-ex-rel-semmes-v-fish-circtddc-1818.