McDanel v. McDanel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McDanel v. McDanel

309 A.2d 784, 455 Pa. 635, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 807

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 3, 1973

DocketAppeal, No. 134

StatusPublished

This text of 309 A.2d 784 (McDanel v. McDanel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDanel v. McDanel, 309 A.2d 784, 455 Pa. 635, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 807 (Pa. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

pee Cueiam,

The decree below is vacated, and the record remanded with instructions that the chancellor prepare a new adjudication in conformity with Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 1516-17. The parties then, if they so choose, may proceed in conformity with Rules 1518-19. Cf. Community Sports, Inc. v. Oakland Oaks, 429 Pa. 412, 240 A. 2d 491 (1968).

Costs to abide the event.

Mr. Justice Robeets took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

pee Cueiam,

The decree below is vacated, and the record remanded with instructions that the chancellor prepare a new adjudication in conformity with Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 1516-17. The parties then, if they so choose, may proceed in conformity with Rules 1518-19. Cf. Community Sports, Inc. v. Oakland Oaks, 429 Pa. 412, 240 A. 2d 491 (1968).

Costs to abide the event.

Mr. Justice Robeets took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.2d 784, 455 Pa. 635, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdanel-v-mcdanel-pa-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack