McDade v. Armenakis

25 P.3d 983, 174 Or. App. 401, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 756
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 23, 2001·No. 96C-14328; A99823·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 959 P2d 623, vac’d and rem’d 327 Or 317, 966 P2d 220 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. Johnson, 155 Or App 295, 964 P2d 284, rev den 328 Or 40, 977 P2d 1170 (1998); Godleske v. Morrow, 161 Or App 523, 984 P2d 339 (1999), rev den 330 Or 553 (2000); Burnett v. Lampert, 173 Or App 577, 25 P3d 337 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDade v. Armenakis, 25 P.3d 983, 174 Or. App. 401, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 756 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

25 P.3d 983 (McDade v. Armenakis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weidner v. Armenakis
959 P.2d 623 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
Burnett v. Lampert
25 P.3d 337 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
Godleske v. Morrow
984 P.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)
Merrill v. Johnson
964 P.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)