McDade v. Adams

136 S.E. 111, 36 Ga. App. 189, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 852
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1926
Docket17566
StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 111 (McDade v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDade v. Adams, 136 S.E. 111, 36 Ga. App. 189, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 852 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized hy the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 111, 36 Ga. App. 189, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdade-v-adams-gactapp-1926.