M.C.D. v. State
675 So. 2d 949, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1996 WL 17271
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 1996
DocketNos. 95-1169, 95-1170
StatusPublished
This text of 675 So. 2d 949 (M.C.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
M.C.D. v. State, 675 So. 2d 949, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1996 WL 17271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinions
In each of the above cases, we find that there was not reasonable suspicion which would justify searching appellant. See In the Interest of A.J.M., 617 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The orders of adjudication and commitment are reversed, and the cases are remanded to the trial court to enter orders granting the motions to suppress.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In the Interest of A.J.M. v. State
617 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 949, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1996 WL 17271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcd-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.