M.C.D. v. State
675 So. 2d 949, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1996 WL 17271
Opinions
In each of the above cases, we find that there was not reasonable suspicion which would justify searching appellant. See In the Interest of A.J.M., 617 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The orders of adjudication and commitment are reversed, and the cases are remanded to the trial court to enter orders granting the motions to suppress.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.C.D. v. State, 675 So. 2d 949, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1996 WL 17271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
675 So. 2d 949 (M.C.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest of A.J.M. v. State
617 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)