McCutchin v. Jamieson
1 D.C. 348
This text of 1 D.C. 348 (McCutchin v. Jamieson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCutchin v. Jamieson, 1 D.C. 348 (D.D.C. 1806).
Opinion
was of opinion that Andrew Jamieson could not, by parol, contradict his seal, and was at law estopped to deny the age. And in equity he had no claim to the further services of the boy, because' he saw the boy at the time he took him, and agreed to his age, and expected only twelve years’ service from him.
The Court discharged the boy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccutchin-v-jamieson-dcd-1806.