McCutchin v. Jamieson
16 F. Cas. 13, 1 Cranch 348
This text of 16 F. Cas. 13 (McCutchin v. Jamieson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCutchin v. Jamieson, 16 F. Cas. 13, 1 Cranch 348 (circtddc 1806).
Opinion
was of opinion that Andrew Jamieson could not, by parol, contradict his seal, and was at law estopped, to deny the age. And in equity he had no claim to the further services of the boy, because he saw the boy at the time he took him, and agreed to his age, and expected only twelve years’ service from him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 13, 1 Cranch 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccutchin-v-jamieson-circtddc-1806.