McCutcheon v. Rivers

68 Mo. 122
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 68 Mo. 122 (McCutcheon v. Rivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCutcheon v. Rivers, 68 Mo. 122 (Mo. 1878).

Opinion

Napton, J.

This suit was brought to recover back $37.50 paid Rivers as agent of an insurance company in Philadelphia, about ten days after the superintendent, in St. Louis, had revoked the license of the company to do [124]*124business in this State. The publication of the fact of revocation is required to be for four weeks. The agent in Jasper county, the defendant, did not see it, and therefore took the premium. The majority of this court are of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, that the revocation of the license is the material fact, that the four-weeks publication is intended to distribute the information as- extensivety as possible, but that the agencies cease when recalled and notice is given. Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latham Mercantile & Commercial Co. v. Harrod
81 P. 214 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1905)
Hartman v. Hollowell
126 Iowa 643 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Jones v. Horn
78 S.W. 638 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
American Insurance v. Smith
73 Mo. 368 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Mo. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccutcheon-v-rivers-mo-1878.