McCutcheon v. Pepsico Leasing Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCutcheon v. Pepsico Leasing Corp.

338 So. 2d 254, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15619

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1976

DocketNos. 75-1267, 75-1268

StatusPublished

This text of 338 So. 2d 254 (McCutcheon v. Pepsico Leasing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCutcheon v. Pepsico Leasing Corp., 338 So. 2d 254, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs, the record on appeal, and having had benefit of argument of counsel for the respective parties, we determine the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, over plaintiff’s objection, the nature and character of plaintiff’s prior criminal convictions. Jones v. State, 305 So.2d 827 (Fla.App.1975).

Accordingly, the final judgment and cost judgment entered in favor of appellee-de-fendant, Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, and against appellant-plaintiff, Ivory McCutcheon, is reversed and remanded for new trial, and the final judgment entered in favor of appellant-plaintiff, Ivory McCutcheon, and against the appellee-de-fendants, Pepsico Leasing Corporation, Pep-sico Truck Rental, Inc., and Deatrick Leading Corp., is reversed and remanded for new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

MAGER, C. J., CROSS, J., and SMITH, LARRY G., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI