McCutchen v. RG BIEG PLUMBING COMPANY, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCutchen v. RG BIEG PLUMBING COMPANY, INC.

306 S.W.3d 204, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, 2010 WL 933826

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketED 93509

StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 204 (McCutchen v. RG BIEG PLUMBING COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCutchen v. RG BIEG PLUMBING COMPANY, INC., 306 S.W.3d 204, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, 2010 WL 933826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

RG Bieg Plumbing Company, Inc., appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversing the administrative law judge’s decision on the issue of notice and finding Mark McCutchen entitled to worker’s compensation benefits for temporary total disability, permanent partial disability, and past medical expenses. 1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission’s award is supported by sufficient and competent evidence on the whole ree- *205 ord. Rule 84.16(b)(4). No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the basis for this order affirming the judgment, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The Commission also found that Claimant’s claim against the Second Injury Fund remains open.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

RG Bieg Plumbing Company, Inc., appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversing the administrative law judge’s decision on the issue of notice and finding Mark McCutchen entitled to worker’s compensation benefits for temporary total disability, permanent partial disability, and past medical expenses. 1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission’s award is supported by sufficient and competent evidence on the whole ree- *205 ord. Rule 84.16(b)(4). No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the basis for this order affirming the judgment, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The Commission also found that Claimant’s claim against the Second Injury Fund remains open.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 204, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, 2010 WL 933826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccutchen-v-rg-bieg-plumbing-company-inc-moctapp-2010.