McCutchen v. Hilleary
16 F. Cas. 13, 1 Cranch 173
This text of 16 F. Cas. 13 (McCutchen v. Hilleary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCutchen v. Hilleary, 16 F. Cas. 13, 1 Cranch 173 (circtddc 1804).
Opinion
Assault and battery. The defendant [Nicholas Hilleary] stated that since the bringing this suit the plaintiff [James McCutchen] had removed from the district to Philadelphia, and has there fixed his residence, &e. Motion by the defendant’s counsel to lay a rule on the plaintiff to give security for costs. Granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 13, 1 Cranch 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccutchen-v-hilleary-circtddc-1804.