McCusker v. State
93 S.W.3d 845, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2483, 2002 WL 31866239
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph McCusker (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining *846 the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCusker v. State, 93 S.W.3d 845, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2483, 2002 WL 31866239 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).
93 S.W.3d 845 (McCusker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest of S.M.S.
93 S.W.3d 845 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)