McCurley v. Wall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

McCurley v. Wall

444 So. 2d 1216, 1984 La. LEXIS 8085

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 27, 1984

DocketNo. 83-C-2593

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 1216 (McCurley v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCurley v. Wall, 444 So. 2d 1216, 1984 La. LEXIS 8085 (La. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hazel Wall McCurley, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 15112 and 15113, from the Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, No. 51903.

Case below: 440 So.2d 780.

Granted. The First Circuit Court of Appeal remanded to the trial court to decide the plea of prescription as to the father’s interest. The court never addressed the other issues raised by relator’s appeal [1217]*1217which now relate to the mother’s interest. Accordingly, the court is hereby ordered to consider the issues raised by appellant, Hazel W. McCurley in her appeal from a judgment of the 21st Judicial District Court dated July 1, 1981, all as more fully set forth in appellant’s brief filed with said appeal and dated June 8, 1982; and to render judgment thereon in accordance with law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hazel Wall McCurley, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 15112 and 15113, from the Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, No. 51903.

Case below: 440 So.2d 780.

Granted. The First Circuit Court of Appeal remanded to the trial court to decide the plea of prescription as to the father’s interest. The court never addressed the other issues raised by relator’s appeal [1217]*1217which now relate to the mother’s interest. Accordingly, the court is hereby ordered to consider the issues raised by appellant, Hazel W. McCurley in her appeal from a judgment of the 21st Judicial District Court dated July 1, 1981, all as more fully set forth in appellant’s brief filed with said appeal and dated June 8, 1982; and to render judgment thereon in accordance with law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 1216, 1984 La. LEXIS 8085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccurley-v-wall-la-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack