McCurdy v. Gage

75 S.W.2d 1107
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided October 24, 1934·No. Motion No. 11288; No. 1749 — 6586·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

On motion for rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

In our original opinion, 69 S.W.(2d) 56, we erroneously stated that on April 8, 1932, T. J. Holcomb filed the suit in the district court of Dallas county against J. H. Gage et al. The record discloses that the suit was filed on April 18, 1932. While this correction in no way changes the conclusions reached in the former opinion, it is made so that the facts stated will accurately state the facts contained in the record.

Having made the foregoing correction, rbain+ilf in error’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

SHARP, Judge.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCurdy v. Gage, 75 S.W.2d 1107 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1934).

75 S.W.2d 1107 (McCurdy v. Gage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Guerrero
64 S.W.3d 685 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co.
760 S.W.2d 245 (Texas Supreme Court, 1988)
Justin Industries, Inc. v. Whiteside
606 S.W.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Wheeler v. Williams
312 S.W.2d 221 (Texas Supreme Court, 1958)