McCurdy v. Agnew

Supreme Court of New Jersey

McCurdy v. Agnew

8 N.J. Eq. 728

DecidedJuly 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.J. Eq. 728 (McCurdy v. Agnew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCurdy v. Agnew, 8 N.J. Eq. 728 (N.J. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Schenck suggested the death of the respondent in appeal, and moved for an order making his administrators and heirs-at-law parties, and for an order of publication, some of the heirs residing in New York, and some being infants. He cited 5 Paige, 528; 4 Ib. 409, 418; 2 Peters, 481; 4 John Ch. 382.

The motion was allowed; and an order directed to be drawn according to the practice in Chancery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Schenck suggested the death of the respondent in appeal, and moved for an order making his administrators and heirs-at-law parties, and for an order of publication, some of the heirs residing in New York, and some being infants. He cited 5 Paige, 528; 4 Ib. 409, 418; 2 Peters, 481; 4 John Ch. 382.

The motion was allowed; and an order directed to be drawn according to the practice in Chancery.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.J. Eq. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccurdy-v-agnew-nj-1850.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack