McCurdy v. Agnew
8 N.J. Eq. 728
Opinion
Mr. Schenck suggested the death of the respondent in appeal, and moved for an order making his administrators and heirs-at-law parties, and for an order of publication, some of the heirs residing in New York, and some being infants. He cited 5 Paige, 528; 4 Ib. 409, 418; 2 Peters, 481; 4 John Ch. 382.
The motion was allowed; and an order directed to be drawn according to the practice in Chancery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCurdy v. Agnew, 8 N.J. Eq. 728 (N.J. 1850).
8 N.J. Eq. 728 (McCurdy v. Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States v. David Weisiger
27 U.S. 481 (Supreme Court, 1829)
Vroom v. Ditmas
5 Paige Ch. 528 (New York Court of Chancery, 1836)